Below is the comparison of Hall's "Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices" (1997) and Lefebvre's "The Production of Space" (1974).

Social Construction

Both scholars emphasize the social construction of elements we might otherwise take for granted—space in Lefebvre's case and meaning in Hall's (Lefebvre, 1974; Hall, 1997). For Lefebvre, space is not a neutral container but something produced by social relations and activities. Similarly, Hall argues that meaning is not inherent but constructed through language and social interaction (Hall, 1997, p. 24-27).

Systems of Representation

Lefebvre discusses how spatial practices, representations of space, and representational spaces interact to produce social space (Lefebvre, 1974). In parallel, Hall explores how language, as a system of representation, plays a role in constructing meaning, identity, and culture (Hall, 1997, p. 16-18).

Role of the Subject

Lefebvre talks about how individuals are both producers and products of space (Lefebvre, 1974). This echoes Hall's discussion of the subject as both a producer and product of meaning and representation. Hall, citing Foucault, suggests that subjects operate within the limits set by their culture (Hall, 1997, p. 55-56).

Power and Discourse

Both thinkers engage with the role of power and discourse in shaping either space or meaning. Lefebvre discusses how dominant ideologies manifest in spatial arrangements (Lefebvre, 1974), while Hall talks about how power dynamics influence systems of representation and thus the construction of meaning (Hall, 1997, p. 26-27).

Praxis

Lefebvre stresses the importance of "spatial practice," referring to the lived experience and daily activities that contribute to the production of space (Lefebvre, 1974). This can be likened to Hall's focus on "signifying practices," where the practice of using language and symbols in daily life contributes to the construction of meaning (Hall, 1997, p. 5).

Interdisciplinarity

Both theories have interdisciplinary applications. Hall's work has been influential in cultural studies, sociology, and communication studies (Hall, 1997). Similarly, Lefebvre's notion of the production of space has been applied in fields like geography, urban studies, and sociology (Lefebvre, 1974).

In summary, while Lefebvre and Hall focus on different aspects of human experience—space and meaning, respectively—both provide frameworks for understanding how these elements are socially constructed, represented, and imbued with power relations.

‍